MARKET LEAD

2026 Strategy Report

Incorrect password
Press Enter to continue
Google Ads Strategy Report

Kayak Pools Midwest
2026 Season Strategy

Testing roadmap, growth opportunities, and strategic initiatives for the upcoming season.

March 10, 2026 Prepared by Market Lead Prepared for Stratablue

Account Overview

Key highlights from the Kayak Pools Midwest Google Ads account as we enter the 2026 season.

$26,375
March Spend (10 days)
4,231
Clicks
394
Conversions
$66.94
Avg CPA
~$79K
Projected Monthly
15
Active Campaigns

Key Changes for 2026

  • ✓ Account reactivated after invoicing pause (Jan-Feb 2026)
  • ✓ 7 new state expansion campaigns launched (Iowa, Kansas, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Nebraska, Missouri, Arizona)
  • ✓ Moved to Search-only strategy; Performance Max campaigns paused for lead quality
  • ✓ UTM tracking and lead attribution system implemented for full-funnel visibility
  • ✓ Customer match audiences uploaded and integrated

Campaign Performance

March 2026 to date (first 10 days)

Active Campaign Breakdown

All campaigns are Search-only. Campaigns tagged [CS] are core/historical, [NT] are new territory expansions, and [AZ] is the Arizona expansion.

CampaignTypeSpendClicksConvCPACTR
S | IllinoisCore$4,16866866$63.1512.5%
S | OhioCore$3,94758450$78.9412.5%
S | IndianaCore$4,09751834$120.5010.8%
S | MichiganCore$3,58955643$83.4713.5%
S | PennsylvaniaCore$1,5211617$217.318.7%
S | KentuckyCore$1,26221029$43.5410.8%
S | Brand | GeneralCore$94640464$14.7933.0%
S | Brand | MidwestCore$858429$2.9432.9%
S | NebraskaNew$875973$291.8412.4%
S | MissouriNew$8661778$108.3010.1%
S | WisconsinNew$734817$104.869.0%
S | MinnesotaNew$666545$133.387.1%
S | IowaNew$614604$153.6210.1%
S | KansasNew$416504$104.199.2%
S | ArizonaArizona$1,77328610$177.389.2%
TOTAL$26,3754,231394$66.94
Note: New territory campaigns (NT/AZ) are in their learning phase with limited data. Higher CPAs are expected during the first 4-6 weeks. Missouri, Wisconsin, and Kansas are showing the strongest early signals.

Performance Max Decision

Why we moved to a Search-only strategy for 2026

Search-Only Strategy

After running Performance Max campaigns from June through November 2025, we made the decision to pause PMax and focus exclusively on Search campaigns for the 2026 season.

Previous Approach (Jun-Nov 2025)

  • Performance Max campaigns across Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, Pennsylvania
  • PMax generated high lead volume at lower CPL initially
  • Lead quality degraded over the last 3 months of running
  • Out-of-territory leads from excluded geographic areas
  • Spam and bot form submissions bypassing targeting controls
  • Google's automated targeting casting too wide a net for lead gen
  • Limited visibility into which placements and audiences drove leads

2026 Approach (Search-Only)

  • Full control over keyword intent: we choose exact search terms
  • Geographic precision at state and city level
  • Ad messaging tailored per market and state
  • Per-state budget allocation and control
  • Clear attribution: every lead tied to campaign, keyword, match type
  • Higher quality leads with genuine purchase intent
  • UTM tracking for full-funnel lead source visibility
Future consideration: We will continue to monitor Google's improvements to Performance Max targeting for lead generation. If targeting controls improve and quality issues are addressed, we may revisit PMax as a supplementary channel in future seasons.

Monthly Spend Trend

Account spend over the last 10 months, showing seasonal patterns and the invoicing pause.

Jun '25
$98,000
Peak Season + PMax
Jul '25
$112,000
Peak Season + PMax
Aug '25
$92,000
Peak Season + PMax
Sep '25
$43,000
Winding Down
Oct '25
$19,000
Off-Season
Nov '25
$5,500
Reduced + PMax Paused
Dec '25
$1,600
Minimal
Jan '26
Inactive (Invoicing)
Account Paused
Feb '26
Inactive (Invoicing)
Account Paused
Mar '26
$26,400 (10 days)
Projected ~$79K/month

2026 Testing Roadmap

Planned tests and experiments across creative, keywords, audiences, and bidding

What We Plan to Test

A structured testing program across five key areas to improve performance this season.

1

Landing Page Split Testing

Headline variations across state pages. Short-form vs long-form layouts. Video hero sections vs static imagery. CTA button variations. Goal: improve conversion rate to offset rising CPCs.

Q2 2026
2

Ad Copy Testing

RSA headline and description rotation per state. Seasonal vs evergreen messaging. Price-focused vs benefit-focused copy. State-specific social proof and testimonials in ad copy.

Ongoing
3

Bidding Strategy Testing

Maximize Conversions vs Target CPA comparison on mature campaigns. Dayparting optimization based on lead quality by time of day. Device bid adjustments based on conversion data.

Q2-Q3 2026
4

Audience Strategy

Customer match list optimization (already uploaded). Similar audience targeting layered on search campaigns. Remarketing list refinement for returning visitors.

Q2 2026
5

New Territory Optimization

4-6 week learning phase for all 7 new state campaigns. Geo-targeting refinement based on early conversion data. Keyword expansion or pruning based on search term performance.

Ongoing

Growth Opportunities

The biggest levers to grow lead volume and improve efficiency

Where We See the Most Potential

1

State Expansion Revenue

7 new states represent significant untapped market potential. If new territories reach core state CPAs ($60-80), this could generate 100+ additional leads per month. Early signs are positive: Missouri, Wisconsin, and Kansas are all converting within the first 10 days.

2

Conversion Rate Optimization

Google CPC has increased 18-20% year-on-year over the last 5 years. Landing page improvements are the #1 lever to maintain or reduce CPA. Even a 1% conversion rate improvement translates to significant CPL reduction at current spend levels.

3

Lead Attribution & Quality

UTM tracking script running hourly for full campaign, ad group, keyword, and match type attribution on every lead. Enables data-driven optimization: pause wasteful keywords, double down on converters. Ability to identify and dispute invalid clicks with Google for refunds.

4

Seasonal Budget Optimization

Front-loaded budgets during peak demand (March-July). Gradual taper as season winds down (August-October). Data-driven budget allocation: shift spend to highest-converting states in real-time.

5

Competitor & Market Intelligence

CPC trend analysis across top 40 keywords tracked over 10 years. Auction insights monitoring for competitive positioning. Market share analysis by state to identify where we can gain ground.

2026 Strategic Initiatives

New this year: what's different from last season

What's Different in 2026

These are specific initiatives being implemented this year that were not part of last season's approach.

InitiativeStatusDescription
Search-Only StrategyActiveMoved away from Performance Max to prioritize lead quality. Full keyword and geographic control.
7-State ExpansionLaunchedIowa, Kansas, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Nebraska, Missouri, Arizona. 35 ad groups, 2,562 keywords, 35 RSA ads.
UTM Lead AttributionActiveHourly script pushing campaign, ad group, keyword, match type, device, and creative data through to CRM.
Landing Page TestingPlanned Q2Systematic A/B testing of headlines, CTAs, page length, and media across state pages.
Customer List IntegrationActiveCustomer match audiences uploaded and refreshed for exclusion targeting and similar audience building.
Invalid Click MonitoringActiveProactive monitoring and dispute process with Google for out-of-territory and bot clicks. Credit recovery.
CPC Trend AnalysisActive10-year keyword cost tracking to forecast CPL trends and proactively adjust strategy.

Recommended Actions

Immediate Next Steps

  • ➤ Confirm spring/summer 2026 budget allocation
  • ➤ Review lead quality from new territory campaigns after 30 days (early April review)
  • ➤ Weekly performance monitoring during ramp-up phase
  • ➤ Initiate landing page split testing program (April target)
  • ➤ Schedule quarterly strategy review cadence
  • ➤ Share CRM lead data for closed-loop attribution analysis